MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 20:23
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 301
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,101
102% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,452
90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2042 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 119
Parallax 101
95% 112 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 106
Splatting 107
86% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 970 500GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 776 795 795 789 800 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 2,492
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 828
371% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 80.4
275% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 909
DQ Mixed 854
608% 761 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 233%
Great: 278%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB
116GB free
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 393 385 421 397 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 469
Write 398
Mixed 407
SusWrite 400
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 28.1
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 208
153% 203 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid WDC WDS500G1B0C- 500GB
131GB free
Firmware: 2010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 699 686 729 701 704 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 1253
Mixed 1113
SusWrite 748
240% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 53.7
195% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 441
403% 589 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 181%
Great: 181%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
39GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 144 144 146 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 449
Mixed 317
SusWrite 178
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 48.8
172% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 133
119% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
769GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 189 202 193 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 192
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 192
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
853GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 177 188 179 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 181
Mixed 82
SusWrite 180
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.8
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 37.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $982
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback