Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 71.3 1-Core 127 2-Core 250 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 938 86% 719 Pts	64-Core 1,345 83% 1,345 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 3510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 18.4 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 19.7 Splatting 25.7 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 324 325 327 327 325 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 2,020 Write 1,482 Mixed 626 SusWrite 380 249% 1,127 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 54.8 221% 85.7 MB/s	DQ Read 998 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 719 592% 850 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 236%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 96GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 304 319 309 319 322 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 368 Write 353 Mixed 320 SusWrite 316 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 26.5 98% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 82.1 90% 154 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 109%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 218GB free Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1051 1053 485 33 97 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1,289 Write 1,070 Mixed 921 SusWrite 469 209% 937 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 71.7 245% 85.9 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 664 DQ Mixed 268 313% 539 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 295%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 99GB free Firmware: UG3000RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 344 Write 297 Mixed 242 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 16.5 74% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 30.8 41% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 734GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 160 160 160 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 159 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 160 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 109%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 299GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 56 57 57 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 53.7 Write 98.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 55.1 78% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 23.4 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 22.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	218x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)