Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 251 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 901 84% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,302 81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 3510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 18.4 16% 20.3 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 19.7 Splatting 25.7 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 329 331 327 315 284 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,998 Write 1,477 Mixed 589 SusWrite 372 245% 1,109 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 53.9 224% 87.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,044 DQ Write 945 DQ Mixed 706 609% 899 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 236%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 82GB free Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 201 161 52 106 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 370 Write 342 Mixed 325 SusWrite 159 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 26.4 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 82.5 91% 155 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 109%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 181GB free Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1107 1103 538 35 54 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,278 Write 1,075 Mixed 940 SusWrite 489 211% 945 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 73.6 247% 86.8 MB/s	DQ Read 676 DQ Write 715 DQ Mixed 269 320% 553 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 295%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 85GB free Firmware: UG3000RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 336 Write 317 Mixed 253 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 18.3 75% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 41.9 46% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 734GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 160 160 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 162 Mixed 104 SusWrite 160 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 109%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 299GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 61 61 56 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 96 Write 76 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 59.4 76% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 47.5 MC Write 45.8 MC Mixed 37.7 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 36 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)