Asus M4A78T-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A78T-E  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '16 at 04:05
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
54% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 268
28% 224 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15
Parallax 17.6
16% 17.2 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 16
Splatting 15.8
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 310
Write 184
Mixed 230
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 24.8
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 68.8
76% 129 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
604GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 96
Mixed 27.4
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.41
87% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
DMI ST3750640A 750GB
296GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 12.6
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.28
52% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78T-E Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78T-E - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback