Asus M4A78T-E

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A78T-E (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110413
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '16 at 04:55
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 88.4 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 98.3 52% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 256 27% 214 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 16.5 16% 17.3 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 16.4 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200 9,142 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2959 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (AA) Unknown 92 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 26 100 77312622618 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 164996 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 51 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 92 100 0 (E9) Unknown 77 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 164996 (F2) Unknown 100 100 174763 (F9) Unknown 100 100 93242	40.7% Average	Read 194 Write 201 Mixed 187 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 12.8 62% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 69.6 DQ Mixed 13.1 20% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 95%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 604GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 175040801 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5029 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 22198001 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 46327 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 276 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 38655361060 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 588644379 (C2) HDA temperature 27 49 73014444059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 26 175040801 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -122196114523184 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3995674600 (F2) Unknown 100 253 657122326	54.7% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 98.3 Mixed 27.6 53% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.38 90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 62%
DMI ST3750640A 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 297GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.3% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 25 Mixed 12.5 26% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.35 47% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.2% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A78T-E Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78T-E - $80

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	16x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	13x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 3300ATIBench 1%, 913 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	13x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16