Asus P5GD1 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5GD1 PRO  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 13.9
13% 16.9 Pts
4-Core 21.6
8-Core 22.8
3% 22.2 Pts
64-Core 21.7
1% 21.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
Asus(1043 828D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.96
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 2.22
4% 3.27 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 2.22
3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCP725050GLAT80 500GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA4CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 11 36 15 22 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 31
Write 12.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 24.3
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 1
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5GD1 PRO Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5GD1 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback