Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 13:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 87.6
44% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 120
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
MSI(1462 809C) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.7.3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.37
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 8.59
5% 8.51 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 9.48
6% 7.41 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.2S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 158 101 47 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.3% Below average
Read 214
Write 193
Mixed 159
SusWrite 98.8
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 7.2
60% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 11.4
16% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
660GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 132 140 131 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 154
Write 138
Mixed 31
SusWrite 130
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 107%
Generic External 120GB
2GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 25 26 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 27.3
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 23.8
33% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback