Hasee CW15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHasee CW15  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P15SM-A/SM1-A
Memory9.7 GB free of 13 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 07:45
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 96
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 504
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Clevo(1558 5281) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8253
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 37.4
17% 28.5 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.1
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-128M6M 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM73902
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 273
Mixed 214
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 27.6
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 98.3
76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 88%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.1 1.4 2 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 0.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 1.8
4% 4.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B2873FHS-CF8 0112 78.A2GC6.9L1 M471B5773DH0-CH9 13GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CW15 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee CW15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback