Gateway NV57H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemGateway NV57H  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway SJV50_HR
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 05:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 104
52% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 293
29% 239 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Acer(1025 0512) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.78
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.87
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 342 359 387 395 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 424
Write 402
Mixed 325
SusWrite 361
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 28.3
92% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 225
198% 296 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73AH0-CH9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NV57H Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway NV57H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback