Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02P3T1
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140501
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 15:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 270
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5074
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 0.04
Parallax 0.22
3% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 9.9 5.5 5.5 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 50
Write 24.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 11.9
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
110GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 3.7 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 2.8
2% 1.72 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback