PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 8100 |
Motherboard | Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20091209 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '18 at 04:08 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.9%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
6.16%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 153 153 165 161 129 MB/s
|
94.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
646GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
404GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 18 17 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 267x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 194x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 115x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 34x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $507 |