Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 04:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 66.5
41% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 104
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 4.94
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 9.23
Splatting 12.6
8% 9.54 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 153 153 165 161 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 187
Mixed 73
SusWrite 148
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
646GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 21.8
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 17.7
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 42%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
404GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 22
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 17.7
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $507
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback