ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel DN2800MT

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	INTEL_ DN2800MT
Motherboard	Intel DN2800MT (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 01:28
Run Duration	376 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2800 451 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 51 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 15.8 21% 25 Pts	4-Core 26.8 8-Core 26.8 4% 26.8 Pts	64-Core 25.1 2% 25.1 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 2012) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1096 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 0.65 Parallax 0.56 1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5M mSATA 64GB-$94 128 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 59 58 53 51 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20% Very poor	Read 245 Write 65.3 Mixed 98.7 SusWrite 54.9 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 4.2 23% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 83%
Sabrent Rocket nano 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 455GB free, PID 0583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 21 21 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 26.4 Write 22.7 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 19.1 31% 23 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 5.3 365% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 193%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x 2x4GB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.1 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback