Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 22:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 220
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 602
61% 494 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 69
Parallax 81.7
54% 72.2 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 67
Splatting 57.1
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bory R500 360G 360GB
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 406 36 104 29 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 486
Write 410
Mixed 347
SusWrite 173
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 25.6
116% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 41.1
86% 167 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
ST320LT0 07-9ZV142 320GB
270GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 101 101 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 101
Write 78
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 101
109% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback