Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 194 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 344 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 37 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 37.7 30% 35.2 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 36 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WL320GSA3272B 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 61 62 56 54 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46% Average	Read 104 Write 98 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 55.9 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 20.2 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	210x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	100x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	81x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	102x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	55x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $343