Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Product Name
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 84
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 393
45% 351 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3901) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.42 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 91 86 96 84 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 372
Write 338
Mixed 345
SusWrite 97.3
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 17.3
78% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 32.5
65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52%
Great: 71%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
654GB free
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 81.2
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 90
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback