Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 574
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gigabyte(1458 3501) 1GB
CLim: 815 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.2
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 20.3
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 302 307 237 191 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 437
Mixed 416
SusWrite 260
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50
182% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
102GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 91
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
48GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 132 141 141 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 140
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 138
78% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA721050KLA330 500GB
326GB free
Firmware: GK6OAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 55
Write 54.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 82.4
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 47%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
143GB free
Firmware: CT100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 49 48 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 55.8
Mixed 35
SusWrite 48.5
34% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB
133GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 25 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 14.3
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 26.7
33% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
364GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.4
Write 64.9
Mixed 52.3
82% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback