Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1NU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1NU  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PT10S
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 15:40
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 235
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 157 3.5 149 76 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 458
Write 408
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 114
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.3
39% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1NU Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1NU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $77
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback