TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P75-D3  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 392
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 79.6%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Gigabyte(1458 356F) 1GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 26.5
18% 23.1 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 24.4
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 19.3%
 Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EVVS-63M5B0 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 81 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 80
Write 79.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 77.1
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 81 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 164
Write 115
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 75.6
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
586GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 121 158 156 159 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
5GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.8 9.3 8 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 7.8
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
203% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 14.9%
 Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 0325 Kingston 99P5471-002.A01LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 43.5%
 Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples94x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples65x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples38x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples30x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples27x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples13x
SU650 240GBAdata  $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples11x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples10x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples7x
A3-1GU64B1-12C 04CB 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 12 samples7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback