TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111021
Uptime43.3 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2380P
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 323
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 70%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.34 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.88%
 Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 202 217 236 224 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 204
Write 363
Mixed 244
SusWrite 229
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 30
99% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 39.7
38% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 56.1%
 Great: 111%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 43.8
Write 29.5
Mixed 56.7
33% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 6.2
1,087% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
529GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 94.2
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 54%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 27.9%
 Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples488x
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples426x
Core i7-2600Intel  $123Bench 67%, 185,630 samples196x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples133x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples123x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples104x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples71x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples44x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples66x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples54x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples52x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback