HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory20.1 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 17:00
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 120
56% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 494
44% 372 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 108
Parallax 103
76% 101 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 98.2
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC7110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 217 215 215 197 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 223
Write 192
Mixed 179
SusWrite 212
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 18.2
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 134
114% 167 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
609GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 29
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 14.6
16% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.3
121% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 70%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
93GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 30.2
Write 25.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 13.2
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 7.2
528% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 132%
General UDisk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.8 8.9 8.3 8.8 8.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 12.6
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.3
9% 7.32 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback