Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 15:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 139
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 236
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 74.8
48% 65.7 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 52.4
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 380 385 384 384 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 370
Mixed 385
SusWrite 372
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 38.4
129% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 221
171% 233 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 182 182 179 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 136
Mixed 104
SusWrite 180
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBGR/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback