Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 132
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 236
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 74.7
48% 65.6 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 52.1
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 379 390 391 393 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 387
Mixed 374
SusWrite 376
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 37.6
128% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 226
173% 234 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 182 182 181 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 175
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 180
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBGR/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback