Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX2540 M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX2540 M1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3099-B1
Memory55.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150203
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 11 '16 at 08:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 136
48% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 525
48% 400 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3.41
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.41
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
Read 531
Write 277
Mixed 377
87% 395 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 23
72% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 70
78% 136 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
826GB free
Firmware: 3.41
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
191GB free
Firmware: 3.41
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GB
8 of 12 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 23
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX2540 M1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX2540 M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback