TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Veriton M430

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M430  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS880M05
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 11:15
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 35.6
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 58.2
28% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 47.9
6% 44.2 Pts
64-Core 52.5
3% 52.5 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 21.2%
 Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.72
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.09
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.11%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 22 6.6 2.4 108 72 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 207
Write 160
Mixed 152
SusWrite 57.7
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 9.6
33% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 30.7
35% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 25.4%
 Great: 53%
Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB
864GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 157 159 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 158
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 90.9%
 Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.6
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 20.4%
 Great: 24%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Veriton M430 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M430

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples6x
GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples14x
R9 270XAMD  $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples5x
GTX 660Nvidia  $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples2x
SSD
CS1311 480GBPNYBench 74%, 44 samples5x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
M700 240GBHPBench 72%, 1,407 samples2x
RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback