Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 260 5,317 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 91 42% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 78.9 8-Core 83 11% 80.9 Pts	64-Core 88 5% 88 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Lighting 4.97 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.88 4% 4.79 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 5.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 55 64 61 68 73 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.1% Poor	Read 203 Write 106 Mixed 153 SusWrite 71 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 10.3 26% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples	6x

RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16