Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 20:19
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 258
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 728
74% 598 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.6
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,376
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,012
356% 1620 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 82.6
281% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 951
703% 927 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
34GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,674
Write 4844
Mixed 4,853
1,142% 5,124 MB/s
4K Read 576
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 347
1,454% 394 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 978
772% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
214GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 330 108 125 88 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 854
Write 561
Mixed 569
SusWrite 214
122% 549 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 51
184% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 316
263% 371 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 122%
Great: 157%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$146
643GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 187 180 170 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 191
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 180
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
95GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 179 178 177 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 145
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 175
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000540AS 4TB
157GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 89 89 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.6
Write 65.7
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 87.9
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback