Asrock H110M-DVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVP  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '16 at 10:40
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 104
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 401
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 39.3
38% 43.3 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.1
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD5000AAKX-001CA0 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 297
Write 83.2
Mixed 119
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 7.52
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 7.92
54% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 14.3
27% 53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
347GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 88.1
Mixed 75.7
64% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.27
66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
125GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 102
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.42
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVP Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback