Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 16:19
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 171
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 614
56% 471 Pts
64-Core 1,607
100% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 102
Reflection 98
Parallax 186
83% 129 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 147
Splatting 143
109% 131 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 826
Write 891
Mixed 568
170% 762 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 37.3
138% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 467
394% 575 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 210%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
233GB free
Firmware: EXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 319
Write 309
Mixed 280
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 33.8
112% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 200
137% 171 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 99.3
Mixed 68.2
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 90%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
944GB free
Firmware: AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.5
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 77%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
190GB free
Firmware: 0A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.6
Write 71
Mixed 66.2
52% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
10GB free
Firmware: 0A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66
Write 65.4
Mixed 49.5
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
143GB free
Firmware: 0A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 89
73% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
191GB free
Firmware: CC31
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 63.5
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
67GB free
Firmware: AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 42.2
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
867GB free
Firmware: 1D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 97.6
Mixed 75.7
69% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 17.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback