Asus M4A785T-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A785T-M  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '16 at 08:53
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 65.9
44% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 72
8-Core 78.7
10% 75.3 Pts
64-Core 84.8
5% 84.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Asus(1043 0376) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.84
1% 3.25 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A02
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 23
39% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.24
84% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 54%
USBModem Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2% Terrible
Read 6.38
Write 3.4
Mixed 3.77
5% 4.52 MB/s
4K Read 1.34
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.09
8% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785T-M Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback