Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 45.8 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 109 40% 69.8 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 134 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 749GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 127 113 113 132 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 200 Write 61.9 Mixed 173 SusWrite 134 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 13.4 45% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 133%
Ricoh Memory Stick Disk Device 0GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free Firmware: 02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 5 4% 6 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 5%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 129GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 55GB free Firmware: 02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 12 11 12 14 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	9.59% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 13.1 9% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 247% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.59% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM