HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843B
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '19 at 01:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 618
71% 555 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 843B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.78
6% 8.39 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 14.9
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 1TB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 409 404 393 380 358 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 424
Write 365
Mixed 372
SusWrite 392
288% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 44.8
7,550% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 275
2,686% 312 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 38
SusWrite 116
126% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback