Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 515 50% 413 Pts	64-Core 526 33% 526 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 843B) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 23.9 Parallax 31.2 20% 26.7 fps	MRender 33.6 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 25 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 139 137 137 136 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 420 Write 402 Mixed 321 SusWrite 170 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 39.8 132% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 338 255% 343 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 238GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 42 46 41 43 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 34.2 Write 127 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 40.7 44% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 93%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 564GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 41 46 41 43 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 33 Write 89.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 40.5 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 2,577 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 10.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $211

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16