Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GM-USB3  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '16 at 07:56
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 555
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 88.3
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 94
51% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 93.9
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.52
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PH4-CE240 239GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F/W:1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
Read 211
Write 196
Mixed 206
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 7.42
70% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 55.8
DQ Mixed 7.43
15% 30.1 MB/s
Seagate ST3500413AS 500GB
173GB free
Firmware: JC4B
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 71%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB
22GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 55.1
Mixed 51.9
42% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 3.62
Mixed 5.94
10% 9.77 MB/s
4K Read 3.59
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.49
87% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GM-USB3 Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback