Ncstech FOUR4-DT-A426

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNcstech FOUR4-DT-A426  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F2A85-M2
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 14:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 120
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 187
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LX 256GB-$129
214GB free
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 284 285 285 285 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 478
Write 284
Mixed 271
SusWrite 284
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 33.4
118% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 165
140% 206 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 69 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 73
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 67.1
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Team-Elite-1600 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback