Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 168 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 390 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 673 42% 673 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2004) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 49 Parallax 7.75 6% 21.3 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 7.43 Splatting 5.91 7% 8.62 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: C490903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 801 845 892 1045 886 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 347 Write 44.5 Mixed 189 SusWrite 876 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 30.4 79% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 754 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 519 369% 487 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 228%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 22.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 20.6 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,024x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	444x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	274x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	273x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	158x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	765x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16