Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 12:52
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 816
86% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 113
Parallax 224
116% 160 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 138
Splatting 157
114% 136 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 112%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 315 316 254 182 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,981
Write 1,166
Mixed 864
SusWrite 288
237% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 86.9
310% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,005
804% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 246%
Great: 236%
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
35GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 268 267 270 270 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 355
Mixed 397
SusWrite 263
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47
163% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 306
247% 348 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%
PP5-8D512-L1 512GB
431GB free
Firmware: LTNFW1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 371 370 378 379 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 376
Mixed 368
SusWrite 361
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 58.8
202% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 639
410% 469 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 249%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
399GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46% Average
Read 68.2
Write 67.2
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 91.9
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 57%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
156GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 64 66 66 69 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 77
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 67.2
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 34.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback