Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,191
106% 895 Pts
64-Core 1,624
100% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 221
Parallax 210
164% 211 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 198
Splatting 134
153% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 148%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 1498 1851 1972 1985 1937 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,492
Write 1,986
Mixed 1107
SusWrite 1,743
410% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 77.9
263% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,321
DQ Write 1092
DQ Mixed 1,166
884% 1,193 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 341%
Great: 393%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
320GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 392 398 423 436 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 798
Write 504
Mixed 472
SusWrite 414
122% 547 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 41.7
150% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 262
234% 348 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 121%
Great: 182%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
792GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 472 452 451 454 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 451
Mixed 420
SusWrite 457
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 33.6
110% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 37.2
75% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 99%
WD Elements 2TB
603GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 81.6
112% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 44%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
2TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 102
Write 91.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 88.9
112% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 26.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 46
87% 46 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $805
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback