Dell XPS 630i

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 630i  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PP150
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080417
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 03:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 53.1
34% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 95.7
8-Core 97.1
13% 96.4 Pts
64-Core 99.1
6% 99.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Zotac(19DA 1184) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 9.63
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 9.44
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 11
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S37A2 240GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 84 90 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 101
Write 76.5
Mixed 103
SusWrite 88
21% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 22.1
64% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 54.6
DQ Mixed 34.8
27% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
920GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 29
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 29.9
39% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 630i Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 630i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback