Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 20:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 154
56% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 444
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 405
Mixed 332
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 30.1
111% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 123
122% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
105GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 669 668 666 667 509 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,119
Write 778
Mixed 852
SusWrite 619
188% 842 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 64.3
209% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 487
360% 477 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 169%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
378GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 88 90 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 87
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 88
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback