Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 04:09
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.4% Good
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
72% 152 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 637
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 771
52% 771 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$500
EVGA(3842 3175) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 405
Reflection 328
Parallax 397
106% 377 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 342
Splatting 218
102% 309 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,655
Write 1,389
Mixed 674
274% 1,239 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 36.3
141% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 642
504% 700 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 235%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$77
124GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 120
SusWrite 119
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 93.6
70% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 135%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
855GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 415 414 439 428 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 443
Mixed 410
SusWrite 418
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 52.3
170% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 345
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 113%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $970
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback