MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161201
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 01:31
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 748
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 196
Parallax 186
145% 187 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 174
Splatting 124
139% 178 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 236 260 260 261 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,924
Write 1,230
Mixed 519
SusWrite 309
219% 996 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 57.3
225% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 1,117
DQ Mixed 685
639% 988 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 215%
Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
131GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 130 74 70 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 486
Mixed 384
SusWrite 147
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 57.6
200% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 252
220% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
282GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2262 605 610 611 610 610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2550
Write 2,308
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 885
411% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.5
292% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,565
DQ Write 1,422
DQ Mixed 1,470
1,109% 1,486 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 313%
Great: 340%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
571GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 117 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 73
SusWrite 118
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 106
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 27.2
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 30.2
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 2,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59) - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback