PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 03 '19 at 13:32 |
Run Duration | 309 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
87% 154 Pts
|
78% 657 Pts
|
74% 1,187 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
118%
Outstanding
|
131% 168 fps
|
107% 132 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 676 675 673 655 517 MB/s
|
268%
Outstanding
|
393% 1,763 MB/s
|
289% 101 MB/s
|
566% 756 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
44GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 453 392 403 463 291 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
98% 437 MB/s
|
158% 57.6 MB/s
|
175% 292 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 830 256GB-$261
210GB free
Firmware: 3B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 271 273 276 301 287 MB/s
|
77.1%
Very good
|
72% 324 MB/s
|
105% 38.9 MB/s
|
120% 179 MB/s
|
![]() PX04PMC160 1.5TB
862GB free
Firmware: 310AT11K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2260 2257 2254 2208 2230 2237 MB/s
|
297%
Outstanding
|
397% 1,752 MB/s
|
220% 84.6 MB/s
|
583% 777 MB/s
|
![]() UFD 2.0 8GB
2GB free, PID 5001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 6 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
|
4.9%
Terrible
|
12% 9.97 MB/s
|
20% 1.83 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
130%
Outstanding
|
146% 50.9 GB/s
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
77% 52 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 357x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 161x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 127x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 107x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 86x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $418 |