Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 09:56
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 236
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 772
79% 640 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$383
Gigabyte(1458 37C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 168
Parallax 160
124% 160 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 148
Splatting 106
114% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 35 39 34 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
29GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 135 133 115 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 419
Write 331
Mixed 272
SusWrite 167
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 16.6
66% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 41
47% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 61%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
393GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1936 1519 771 613 557 647 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,367
Write 1,945
Mixed 1568
SusWrite 1,007
385% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 82.9
260% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 886
643% 839 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 274%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
130GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 278 241 253 261 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 412
Write 436
Mixed 321
SusWrite 261
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 39.9
137% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 180
154% 219 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 107%
SSD PLUS 480GB
125GB free
Firmware: Z31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 275 252 262 269 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 436
Write 346
Mixed 277
SusWrite 267
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 25.9
102% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 50.1
DQ Mixed 67.1
56% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
312GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 230 192 188 187 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 312
Write 316
Mixed 288
SusWrite 198
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 29.7
104% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 238
177% 235 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 121%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
844GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 23 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 19.4
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
130GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 96.8
Write 97
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 60
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
118GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 113 116 118 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 96
Write 91.2
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 116
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
61GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 154 158 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 140
Mixed 102
SusWrite 160
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
121GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 152 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 144
Write 154
Mixed 117
SusWrite 152
194% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 43.3
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback