Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC Field PG M5  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E37019306
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820EQ
no information, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 564
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 191B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 5.87
5% 6.87 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 13.8
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
947GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 409 391 370 384 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 422
Mixed 380
SusWrite 389
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 34.4
139% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 54.5
115% 237 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 21.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC Field PG M5 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC Field PG M5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback