Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 05 '16 at 10:52
Run Duration436 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 187
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 459
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1580) 1.5GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.9
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 31.4
22% 33.8 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 31.8
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 75.1
Write 81.3
Mixed 78.1
59% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.33
92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 60%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
554GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 82.1
Write 84.8
Mixed 52.1
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.14
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
333GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 84.3
Mixed 79.7
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.23
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 91
Write 90.2
Mixed 99.5
71% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.21
79% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST31500343AS 1.5TB
124GB free
Firmware: SD35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 97.1
Mixed 89
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.44
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 70%
pny USB 2.0 FD 32GB
26GB free, PID 005d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 3.76
Mixed 5.52
10% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.34
4K Write 0.17
4K Mixed 0.26
31% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 8%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
16GB free, PID 00d2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 148
Write 16.8
Mixed 18.8
52% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.93
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.22
55% 3.19 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 859B CT51264BA1339.M16F 859B CT51264BA1339.M16F 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback