Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111027
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 10:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 171
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 336
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.16
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 182 165 154 154 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 390
Write 230
Mixed 157
SusWrite 163
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 26.2
98% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 35.1
37% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 320GB-$29
65GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 91 92 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 85.3
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 92.3
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback