Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '16 at 07:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 478
64% 480 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1155 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 115
73% 89.5 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 86.7
Splatting 82.2
64% 77.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 371
Write 255
Mixed 260
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 8.52
66% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 8.54
13% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
476GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 144
Write 152
Mixed 141
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.34
143% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT2TXOB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback