Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 02:12
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 472
64% 475 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 121
74% 91.6 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 82.3
64% 77.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 371
Write 247
Mixed 261
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 8.81
67% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 42
61% 115 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
484GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 155
Mixed 142
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.35
133% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT2TXOB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback