Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120618
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 05 '16 at 02:59
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 607
60% 492 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.3
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 71.5
42% 63.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 54
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
157GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 508
Write 350
Mixed 274
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 18.6
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 68.6
87% 158 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64% Good
Read 494
Write 241
Mixed 243
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 16
77% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 58.6
66% 118 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 367
Write 136
Mixed 171
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 18.4
76% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 42.6
50% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 124%
SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series 256GB
67GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 159
Mixed 137
202% 164 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 11
1,493% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 10.4
1,794% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 163%
Great: 162%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
59GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 136
Write 115
Mixed 80.4
135% 111 MB/s
4K Read 6.42
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.74
80% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 37%
Lexar uSD UHS2 RDR 64GB
58GB free, PID b055
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 27.9
Mixed 31
41% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 4.04
4K Mixed 3.14
275% 5.16 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 53%
Jmicron Corp. 64GB
28GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
128% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 112
Mixed 125
166% 139 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 7.65
1,138% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 28.1
DQ Mixed 8.25
1,299% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 128%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C11 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $975
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback