Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.2
36% 51 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 137 112 143 154 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 130
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 134
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%
Multi Flash Reader 1GB
1GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Read 5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 0.4
1% 1.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback